Minnesota · NAICS 923 · Annual, 2025

Administration of Human Resource Programs in Minnesota

Employment, establishments and average pay for NAICS 923 in Minnesota, 2004–2025, from DTG's QCEW-based estimates.

In 2025, Administration of Human Resource Programs (NAICS 923) employed about 18,900 people in Minnesota across roughly 343 establishments, with average annual pay of $91,880.

Employment in Administration of Human Resource Programs in Minnesota grew 19.5% from 2020 to 2025. Employment reached its 2004–2025 peak in 2025, at about 18,900. Quarterly values, full industry detail and projections to 2036 for Minnesota are included with a free account. County-level detail is part of every paid plan, or one county free for seven days.

  • 18,900Employment, 2025
  • 343Establishments
  • $91,880Avg. annual pay
  • 0.6%Share of Minnesota jobs
  • 1.11Location quotient

Employment, 2004 to 2025

Annual average · all ownerships

Employment in Administration of Human Resource Programs in Minnesota, 2004–2025Line chart of annual employment from 2004 to 2025, from 14,400 to 18,900.05K10K15K20K20042010201520202025

Annual employment, 2004–2025: 2004 14,400; 2005 14,600; 2006 15,000; 2007 15,500; 2008 15,500; 2009 15,800; 2010 16,100; 2011 15,300; 2012 15,100; 2013 15,500; 2014 15,900; 2015 15,900; 2016 16,000; 2017 15,900; 2018 15,800; 2019 15,800; 2020 15,800; 2021 16,000; 2022 16,100; 2023 17,000; 2024 18,600; 2025 18,900.

Last ten years

Annual · 10 years

YearEmploymentEstab.Avg. annual payChangeSource
202518,917343$91,880 1.8%pub.
202418,585527$86,676 9.1%pub.
202317,034508$81,392 5.9%pub.
202216,089500$77,322 0.7%pub.
202115,972492$73,274 0.9%pub.
202015,836455$72,542 0.1%pub.
201915,815403$67,706 0.2%pub.
201815,843456$65,529 0.4%pub.
201715,898431$63,282 0.4%pub.
201615,956398$62,759 0.2%pub.

The full history from 2004 and quarterly values are available with a free account.

Where these numbers come from

Reading these figures

The figures on this page come from one named vintage, stated below, and are annual values for all ownerships combined. Where QCEW withheld a value, the marked figure is an estimate that DTG produced under the constraints of the published record; suppression is a property of QCEW, not of DTG, and a withheld value is marked rather than silently omitted. Two things DTG itself holds back, and says so where it does: an estimate that cannot be given a reliability score is not shown, and average pay is not shown where fewer than three jobs are reported. The row is marked withheld, with the reason in a note beneath the table. The mark is on every row that carries a value: the headline, the yearly history, the subsectors and the other states. An estimated value that rounds below one is shown as less than one, not as zero. Quarterly figures, county figures and projected years are in the app.

How this figure was built

Employment is the average of the three monthly counts in each quarter, averaged across the year, and establishments are averaged across the year the same way. Average annual pay is the year’s total wages divided by that average employment. Each of these is DTG’s value: QCEW’s published figure where QCEW disclosed it, and DTG’s estimate, marked, where it did not. How withheld values are estimated, and what the reliability score beside a figure means, are described on the industry data and disclosure and provenance pages.

Estimated by Data Tactical Group from BLS QCEW, with CES/SAE and projection inputs described in the methodology. Method: Disclosure, Industry.

Notes

Data Tactical Group is an independent company and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any federal agency.

Administration of Human Resource Programs in Minnesota, quarterly, at full depth

This page shows annual figures for administration of human resource programs in Minnesota. A free account shows every detailed industry beneath it, quarterly, for every state, with projections to ten years. No card.

County figures, file export and the API are on paid plans.